[Bug 110967] Naming packages with pro suffix depending if open or close source

bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
Sat Jun 22 04:20:03 UTC 2019


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110967

            Bug ID: 110967
           Summary: Naming packages with pro suffix depending if open or
                    close source
           Product: DRI
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: Other
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: medium
         Component: DRM/AMDgpu-pro
          Assignee: dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
          Reporter: ashark at linuxcomp.ru

In 19.20-812932 release for Ubuntu there appeared packages roct-amdgpu-pro and
roct-amdgpu-pro-dev.
They have a MIT license, but contains -pro suffix.
Is there any specific intention to do so? I thought that only proprietary
packages should have that suffix.

Also there are packages:
amf-amdgpu-pro
opencl-amdgpu-pro-comgr
opencl-amdgpu-pro-dev
opencl-amdgpu-pro-hip
What about their suffixes?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20190622/53a75343/attachment.html>


More information about the dri-devel mailing list