[PATCH 0/7] drm/vc4: Allow for more boot-time configuration

Daniel Vetter daniel at ffwll.ch
Mon Mar 11 13:00:33 UTC 2019


On Tue, Mar 05, 2019 at 10:14:16AM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 12:06:01PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > Since a change of the command line parser can pretty easily get things
> > > wrong and introduce regressions, I also worked with a number of unit tests
> > > that you can find here: http://code.bulix.org/tpo7dg-607264?raw
> > 
> > Would kselftests be an appropriate way to include these, maybe?
> 
> That looks like a good way to do this indeed. I'll try it and let you know

drm/selftests already has a pile of infrastructure, together with igt and
will be run in intel-gfx-ci to make sure stuff keeps working.

And yeah parser like this is imo the perfect selftest use-case.

If you wonder about kselftest and kunit and all that: We have some compat
glue, but I do hope that longterm we can all unify these internal
self/unit tests under one framework. For now I recommend the drm one,
since that's CI'ed.

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the dri-devel mailing list