[PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement the pwm_chip
Shawn Guo
shawn.guo at linaro.org
Thu Dec 10 01:51:37 UTC 2020
On Mon, Dec 07, 2020 at 10:40:22PM -0600, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The SN65DSI86 provides the ability to supply a PWM signal on GPIO 4,
> with the primary purpose of controlling the backlight of the attached
> panel. Add an implementation that exposes this using the standard PWM
> framework, to allow e.g. pwm-backlight to expose this to the user.
>
> Special thanks to Doug Anderson for suggestions related to the involved
> math.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson at linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 202 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 202 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index f27306c51e4d..43c0acba57ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> * datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/sn65dsi86.pdf
> */
>
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> #include <linux/bits.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/debugfs.h>
> @@ -14,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_graph.h>
> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> +#include <linux/pwm.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
>
> @@ -89,6 +91,11 @@
> #define SN_ML_TX_MODE_REG 0x96
> #define ML_TX_MAIN_LINK_OFF 0
> #define ML_TX_NORMAL_MODE BIT(0)
> +#define SN_PWM_PRE_DIV_REG 0xA0
> +#define SN_BACKLIGHT_SCALE_REG 0xA1
> +#define BACKLIGHT_SCALE_MAX 0xFFFF
> +#define SN_BACKLIGHT_REG 0xA3
> +#define SN_PWM_EN_INV_REG 0xA5
> #define SN_AUX_CMD_STATUS_REG 0xF4
> #define AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_RPLY_TOUT BIT(3)
> #define AUX_IRQ_STATUS_AUX_SHORT BIT(5)
> @@ -111,6 +118,8 @@
>
> #define SN_LINK_TRAINING_TRIES 10
>
> +#define SN_PWM_GPIO 3
So this maps to the GPIO4 described in sn65dsi86 datasheet. I'm
wondering if it's more readable to define the following SHIFT constants
(your code), and use GPIO_MUX_GPIO4_SHIFT >> 2 where you need GPIO
offset?
#define GPIO_MUX_GPIO1_SHIFT 0
#define GPIO_MUX_GPIO2_SHIFT 2
#define GPIO_MUX_GPIO3_SHIFT 4
#define GPIO_MUX_GPIO4_SHIFT 6
If you agree, you may consider to integrate this patch beforehand:
https://github.com/shawnguo2/linux/commit/7cde887ffb3b27a36e77a08bee3666d14968b586
Shawn
> +
> /**
> * struct ti_sn_bridge - Platform data for ti-sn65dsi86 driver.
> * @dev: Pointer to our device.
> @@ -162,6 +171,12 @@ struct ti_sn_bridge {
> struct gpio_chip gchip;
> DECLARE_BITMAP(gchip_output, SN_NUM_GPIOS);
> #endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM)
> + struct pwm_chip pchip;
> + bool pwm_enabled;
> + unsigned int pwm_refclk;
> + atomic_t pwm_pin_busy;
> +#endif
> };
>
> static const struct regmap_range ti_sn_bridge_volatile_ranges[] = {
> @@ -499,6 +514,14 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_set_refclk_freq(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
>
> regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DPPLL_SRC_REG, REFCLK_FREQ_MASK,
> REFCLK_FREQ(i));
> +
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM)
> + /*
> + * The PWM refclk is based on the value written to SN_DPPLL_SRC_REG,
> + * regardless of its actual sourcing.
> + */
> + pdata->pwm_refclk = ti_sn_bridge_refclk_lut[i];
> +#endif
> }
>
> static void ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> @@ -981,6 +1004,161 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_parse_dsi_host(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_PWM)
> +static int ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> + return atomic_xchg(&pdata->pwm_pin_busy, 1) ? -EBUSY : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> + atomic_set(&pdata->pwm_pin_busy, 0);
> +}
> +
> +static struct ti_sn_bridge *
> +pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> +{
> + return container_of(chip, struct ti_sn_bridge, pchip);
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(chip);
> +
> + return ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(pdata);
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(chip);
> +
> + ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(pdata);
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> + const struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = pwm_chip_to_ti_sn_bridge(chip);
> + unsigned int pwm_en_inv;
> + unsigned int backlight;
> + unsigned int pwm_freq;
> + unsigned int pre_div;
> + unsigned int scale;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!pdata->pwm_enabled) {
> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(pdata->dev);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_GPIO_CTRL_REG,
> + SN_GPIO_MUX_MASK << (2 * SN_PWM_GPIO),
> + SN_GPIO_MUX_SPECIAL << (2 * SN_PWM_GPIO));
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pdata->dev, "failed to mux in PWM function\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (state->enabled) {
> + /*
> + * Per the datasheet the PWM frequency is given by:
> + *
> + * PWM_FREQ = REFCLK_FREQ / (PWM_PRE_DIV * BACKLIGHT_SCALE + 1)
> + *
> + * In order to find the PWM_FREQ that best suits the requested
> + * state->period, the PWM_PRE_DIV is calculated with the
> + * maximum possible number of steps (BACKLIGHT_SCALE_MAX). The
> + * actual BACKLIGHT_SCALE is then adjusted down to match the
> + * requested period.
> + *
> + * The BACKLIGHT value is then calculated against the
> + * BACKLIGHT_SCALE, based on the requested duty_cycle and
> + * period.
> + */
> + pwm_freq = NSEC_PER_SEC / state->period;
> + pre_div = DIV_ROUND_UP(pdata->pwm_refclk / pwm_freq - 1, BACKLIGHT_SCALE_MAX);
> + scale = (pdata->pwm_refclk / pwm_freq - 1) / pre_div;
> +
> + backlight = scale * state->duty_cycle / state->period;
> +
> + ret = regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_PWM_PRE_DIV_REG, pre_div);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pdata->dev, "failed to update PWM_PRE_DIV\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ti_sn_bridge_write_u16(pdata, SN_BACKLIGHT_SCALE_REG, scale);
> + ti_sn_bridge_write_u16(pdata, SN_BACKLIGHT_REG, backlight);
> + }
> +
> + pwm_en_inv = FIELD_PREP(BIT(1), !!state->enabled) |
> + FIELD_PREP(BIT(0), state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED);
> + ret = regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_PWM_EN_INV_REG, pwm_en_inv);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(pdata->dev, "failed to update PWM_EN/PWM_INV\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + pdata->pwm_enabled = !!state->enabled;
> +out:
> +
> + if (!pdata->pwm_enabled)
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(pdata->dev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct pwm_ops ti_sn_pwm_ops = {
> + .request = ti_sn_pwm_request,
> + .free = ti_sn_pwm_free,
> + .apply = ti_sn_pwm_apply,
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static struct pwm_device *ti_sn_pwm_of_xlate(struct pwm_chip *pc,
> + const struct of_phandle_args *args)
> +{
> + struct pwm_device *pwm;
> +
> + if (args->args_count != 1)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + pwm = pwm_request_from_chip(pc, 0, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(pwm))
> + return pwm;
> +
> + pwm->args.period = args->args[0];
> +
> + return pwm;
> +}
> +
> +static int ti_sn_setup_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> + pdata->pchip.dev = pdata->dev;
> + pdata->pchip.ops = &ti_sn_pwm_ops;
> + pdata->pchip.base = -1;
> + pdata->pchip.npwm = 1;
> + pdata->pchip.of_xlate = ti_sn_pwm_of_xlate;
> + pdata->pchip.of_pwm_n_cells = 1;
> +
> + return pwmchip_add(&pdata->pchip);
> +}
> +
> +static void ti_sn_remove_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> +{
> + pwmchip_remove(&pdata->pchip);
> +
> + if (pdata->pwm_enabled)
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(pdata->dev);
> +}
> +#else
> +static int ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) { return 0; }
> +static void ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) {}
> +static int ti_sn_setup_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) { return 0; }
> +static void ti_sn_remove_pwmchip(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata) {}
> +#endif
> +
> #if defined(CONFIG_OF_GPIO)
>
> static int tn_sn_bridge_of_xlate(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> @@ -1113,10 +1291,25 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int ti_sn_bridge_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +
> + if (offset == SN_PWM_GPIO)
> + return ti_sn_pwm_pin_request(pdata);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void ti_sn_bridge_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
> {
> + struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
> +
> /* We won't keep pm_runtime if we're input, so switch there on free */
> ti_sn_bridge_gpio_direction_input(chip, offset);
> +
> + if (offset == SN_PWM_GPIO)
> + ti_sn_pwm_pin_release(pdata);
> }
>
> static const char * const ti_sn_bridge_gpio_names[SN_NUM_GPIOS] = {
> @@ -1136,6 +1329,7 @@ static int ti_sn_setup_gpio_controller(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> pdata->gchip.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> pdata->gchip.of_xlate = tn_sn_bridge_of_xlate;
> pdata->gchip.of_gpio_n_cells = 2;
> + pdata->gchip.request = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_request;
> pdata->gchip.free = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_free;
> pdata->gchip.get_direction = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_get_direction;
> pdata->gchip.direction_input = ti_sn_bridge_gpio_direction_input;
> @@ -1282,6 +1476,12 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> return ret;
> }
>
> + ret = ti_sn_setup_pwmchip(pdata);
> + if (ret) {
> + pm_runtime_disable(pdata->dev);
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, pdata);
>
> pdata->aux.name = "ti-sn65dsi86-aux";
> @@ -1320,6 +1520,8 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>
> drm_bridge_remove(&pdata->bridge);
>
> + ti_sn_remove_pwmchip(pdata);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> --
> 2.29.2
>
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list