[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "dma-buf: Report signaled links inside dma-fence-chain"

[Dave Airlie]

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 05:27, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020, Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
> > WTUF?
> >
> > How did this ever land in my tree, there is no ACK on this from anyone
> > in core dma-buf,
> >
> > Intel team, clean your house up here, I'm going to have to ask you to
> > stop Chris merging stuff without oversight, if this sort of thing
> > happens, this is totally unacceptable.
>
> There's no argument, an ack is required.
>
> In fairness to the i915 maintainers, though, this particular commit was
> merged via drm-misc-next [1].
>
> As a side note, there seem to be extra checks in place for acks when
> applying non-i915 patches to drm-intel; there are no such checks for
> drm-misc.

Sorry Jani, thanks for chasing that down.

drm-misc we need to oversight a bit more, I don't think we should be
landing things that affect core code with single company acks.

Dave.