[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-codec: Document vcc-supply property
Laurent Pinchart
laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com
Tue Sep 1 10:22:23 UTC 2020
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 06:58:50AM +0000, Biju Das wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-codec:
> > Document vcc-supply property
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:22:17PM +0100, Biju Das wrote:
> > > Document optional vcc-supply property that may be used as VCC source.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz at bp.renesas.com>
> > > ---
> > > New patch Ref: Ref:https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11705819/
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml
> > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml
> > > index 68951d56ebba..3248be31eceb 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml
> > > @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ properties:
> > > The GPIO used to control the power down line of this device.
> > > maxItems: 1
> > >
> > > + vcc-supply:
> > > + maxItems: 1
> >
> > Probably should be 'power-supply' to align with the 'simple' panels.
> > That's also to signify there's only 1 supply. Using 'vcc' would encourage
> > adding 'vdd-supply', 'vddio-supply', etc. A second supply I'll NAK because at
> > that point it's not a simple bridge with no configuration (it's arguably already
> > there).
>
> Yes, I am ok with 'power-supply', since LVDS CODEC driver is generic
> and also to align with terminology used in generic 'simple' panels.
>
> In our case this Receiver converts LVDS signals to RGB signals and fed
> this signal to simple panel.
> On the receiver part, We need to supply power to TTL output, PLL and
> LVDS input. It all derived from the single power source.
>
> Laurent, Please share you opinion on this.
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart at ideasonboard.com>
That is, I think it's a good idea to rename it, and I agree with Rob
about not adding a second supply.
I've applied the modified patch to my tree, and will send a pull request
this week.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list