[PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-codec: Document vcc-supply property

[Laurent Pinchart]

Hi Rob,

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 05:04:58PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 04:22:17PM +0100, Biju Das wrote:
> > Document optional vcc-supply property that may be used as VCC source.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz at bp.renesas.com>
> > ---
> > New patch Ref: Ref:https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11705819/
> > ---
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml         | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml
> > index 68951d56ebba..3248be31eceb 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/lvds-codec.yaml
> > @@ -79,6 +79,9 @@ properties:
> >        The GPIO used to control the power down line of this device.
> >      maxItems: 1
> >  
> > +  vcc-supply:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> 
> Probably should be 'power-supply' to align with the 'simple' panels. 
> That's also to signify there's only 1 supply. Using 'vcc' would 
> encourage adding 'vdd-supply', 'vddio-supply', etc. A second supply I'll 
> NAK because at that point it's not a simple bridge with no configuration 
> (it's arguably already there).

Fully agreed.

Do I get your Ab or Rb line with s/vcc/power/ and the commit message
updated to

    dt-bindings: display: bridge: lvds-codec: Document power-supply property

    Document optional power-supply property that may be used to specify the
    regulator powering up the device.

?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart