[PATCH 02/12] drm/mgag200: Return errno codes from PLL compute functions

Sam Ravnborg sam at ravnborg.org
Fri Jul 9 18:53:25 UTC 2021


On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 02:45:05PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Return -EINVAL if there's no PLL configuration for the given pixel
> clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
> index 482843ebb69f..045a20055515 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_mode.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int mgag200_g200_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
>  
>  	if (clock > p_clk_max) {
>  		drm_err(dev, "Pixel Clock %ld too high\n", clock);
> -		return 1;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (clock < p_clk_min >> 3)
> @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int mga_g200se_set_plls(struct mga_device *mdev, long clock)
>  
>  	if (delta > permitteddelta) {
>  		pr_warn("PLL delta too large\n");
> -		return 1;
> +		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
>  	misc = RREG8(MGA_MISC_IN);

The return value is ignored but I assume it makes sense in a later
patch. Should mgag200_crtc_set_plls() return -EINVAL if there was no
match? Today it returns 0 - which is not an error.

	Sam


More information about the dri-devel mailing list