[PATCH v4 09/13] drm/msm/dp: Don't enable HPD interrupts for edp
Dmitry Baryshkov
dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org
Mon Dec 5 21:11:52 UTC 2022
On 6 December 2022 00:07:12 GMT+03:00, Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org> wrote:
>
>
>On 5 December 2022 20:44:29 GMT+03:00, Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande at quicinc.com> wrote:
>>From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson at linaro.org>
>>
>>Most instances where HPD interrupts are masked and unmasked are guareded
>>by the presence of an EDP panel being connected, but not all. Extend
>>this to cover the last few places, as HPD interrupt handling is not used
>>for the EDP case.
>
>I don't remember whether I asked that or not. Would it be possible to move hpd irq enablement to bridge's hpd_enable() / hpd_disable() callbacks ? I think this would allow us to drop the is_edp checks.
Ignore this. I should read the series carefully.
>
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson at linaro.org>
>>Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>
>>Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande at quicinc.com>
>>---
>>
>>Changes since v3:
>>- None
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>index 17fcf8cd84cd..bb92c33beff8 100644
>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_display.c
>>@@ -610,8 +610,10 @@ static int dp_hpd_plug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
>> }
>>
>> /* enable HDP irq_hpd/replug interrupt */
>>- dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog,
>>- DP_DP_IRQ_HPD_INT_MASK | DP_DP_HPD_REPLUG_INT_MASK, true);
>>+ if (!dp->dp_display.is_edp)
>>+ dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog,
>>+ DP_DP_IRQ_HPD_INT_MASK | DP_DP_HPD_REPLUG_INT_MASK,
>>+ true);
>>
>> drm_dbg_dp(dp->drm_dev, "After, type=%d hpd_state=%d\n",
>> dp->dp_display.connector_type, state);
>>@@ -651,8 +653,10 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
>> dp->dp_display.connector_type, state);
>>
>> /* disable irq_hpd/replug interrupts */
>>- dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog,
>>- DP_DP_IRQ_HPD_INT_MASK | DP_DP_HPD_REPLUG_INT_MASK, false);
>>+ if (!dp->dp_display.is_edp)
>>+ dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog,
>>+ DP_DP_IRQ_HPD_INT_MASK | DP_DP_HPD_REPLUG_INT_MASK,
>>+ false);
>>
>> /* unplugged, no more irq_hpd handle */
>> dp_del_event(dp, EV_IRQ_HPD_INT);
>>@@ -678,7 +682,8 @@ static int dp_hpd_unplug_handle(struct dp_display_private *dp, u32 data)
>> }
>>
>> /* disable HPD plug interrupts */
>>- dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog, DP_DP_HPD_PLUG_INT_MASK, false);
>>+ if (!dp->dp_display.is_edp)
>>+ dp_catalog_hpd_config_intr(dp->catalog, DP_DP_HPD_PLUG_INT_MASK, false);
>>
>> /*
>> * We don't need separate work for disconnect as
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list