[igt-dev] Must-Pass Test Suite for KMS drivers

[Thomas Zimmermann]

Hi

Am 07.11.22 um 11:26 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 10:43, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Am 07.11.22 um 10:30 schrieb Maxime Ripard:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 09:31:38AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>>> Am 24.10.22 um 14:43 schrieb maxime at cerno.tech:
>>>>> I've discussing the idea for the past year to add an IGT test suite that
>>>>> all well-behaved KMS drivers must pass.
>>>>>
>>>>> The main idea behind it comes from v4l2-compliance and cec-compliance,
>>>>> that are being used to validate that the drivers are sane.
>>>>>
>>>>> We should probably start building up the test list, and eventually
>>>>> mandate that all tests pass for all the new KMS drivers we would merge
>>>>> in the kernel, and be run by KCi or similar.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did a first pass to create a draft of such a test-suite, which would
>>>>> contain:
>>>>>
>>>>> igt at core_auth@basic-auth
>>>>> igt at core_auth@getclient-master-drop
>>>>> igt at core_auth@getclient-simple
>>>>> igt at core_auth@many-magics
>>>>> igt at core_getclient
>>>>> igt at core_getstats
>>>>> igt at core_getversion
>>>>> igt at core_hotunplug@hotrebind-lateclose
>>>>> igt at core_hotunplug@hotunbind-rebind
>>>>> igt at core_hotunplug@unbind-rebind
>>>>> igt at core_setmaster
>>>>> igt at core_setmaster_vs_auth
>>>>> igt at device_reset@unbind-reset-rebind
>>>>> igt at drm_read
>>>>> igt at dumb_buffer
>>>>> igt at fbdev
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we make this test optional? At least sprd decided to not support fbdev
>>>> at all.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure we need to make that test optional, or at least, we should
>>> run it all the time, but skip it if there's no fbdev emulation, and not
>>> report it as a failure?
>>
>> Sure. I just meant that fbdev support shouldn't be a blocker. If there,
>> it should work of course.
> 
> Not supporting fbdev looks more like an accident than intention here,
> and maybe a good reason to have these kind of must-past lists.

No. Back then, I specifically asked the developer, Kevin Tang IIRC, 
about fbdev/console support and he replied that he has no intention of 
adding it.

It's the only driver without fbdev, but as we don't have such a 
requirements AFAIK, I left it at that.

Best regards
Thomas

> Eventually, once the i915-ism is worked out of igt well enough for a
> set of tests at least. The drm/ci effort should help in building up
> that list (by essentially extracting the common set of tests that
> everyone passes and graduating that to the must-pass list for kms
> conformance or whatever we'll call it).
> -Daniel
> 
>>
>> Best regards
>> Thomas
>>
>>>
>>> Maxime
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Zimmermann
>> Graphics Driver Developer
>> SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
>> Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>> (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
>> Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 840 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20221107/f015d61e/attachment.sig>