[PATCH 3/3] drm/i915/mtl: C6 residency and C state type for MTL SAMedia

[Dixit, Ashutosh]

On Fri, 14 Oct 2022 20:26:18 -0700, Ashutosh Dixit wrote:
>
> From: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar at intel.com>

Hi Badal,

One question below.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
> index 1fb053cbf52db..3a9bb4387248e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_pm_debugfs.c
> @@ -256,6 +256,61 @@ static int ilk_drpc(struct seq_file *m)
>	return 0;
>  }
>
> +static int mtl_drpc(struct seq_file *m)
> +{

Here we have:

> +	global_forcewake = intel_uncore_read(uncore, FORCEWAKE_GT_GEN9);
and
> +	seq_printf(m, "Global Forcewake Requests: 0x%x\n", global_forcewake);

In gen6_drpc we have:

	mt_fwake_req = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, FORCEWAKE_MT);
and
	seq_printf(m, "Multi-threaded Forcewake Request: 0x%x\n", mt_fwake_req);

Also:
	#define FORCEWAKE_MT		_MMIO(0xa188)
	#define FORCEWAKE_GT_GEN9	_MMIO(0xa188)

So they are both the same register. So what is the reason for this
difference, which one should we use?

Also let's have the prints in the same order as gen6_drpc (move fw request
before rc6 residency).

Thanks.
--
Ashutosh