[PATCH] dt-bindings: qcom: Update RPMHPD entries for some SoCs

[Rohit Agarwal]

On 7/27/2023 11:06 AM, Pavan Kondeti wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 10:21:10AM +0530, Rohit Agarwal wrote:
>> Update the RPMHPD references with new bindings defined in rpmhpd.h
>> for Qualcomm SoCs SM8[2345]50.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar at quicinc.com>
>> ---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml    | 3 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8350-videocc.yaml   | 3 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-camcc.yaml     | 3 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-dispcc.yaml    | 3 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8450-videocc.yaml   | 3 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,sm8550-dispcc.yaml    | 3 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,videocc.yaml          | 3 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8250-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8250-mdss.yaml          | 7 ++++---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8350-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8350-mdss.yaml          | 5 +++--
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8450-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8450-mdss.yaml          | 7 ++++---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8550-dpu.yaml | 3 ++-
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/qcom,sm8550-mdss.yaml          | 7 ++++---
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/qcom,sm8250-venus.yaml     | 3 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/sdhci-msm.yaml               | 3 ++-
>>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/qcom,sm8350-pas.yaml  | 5 +++--
>>   18 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
>> index d6774db..d6b81c0 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sm8x50.yaml
>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ examples:
>>     - |
>>       #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
>>       #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-rpmpd.h>
>> +    #include <dt-bindings/power/qcom,rpmhpd.h>
>>       clock-controller at af00000 {
>>         compatible = "qcom,sm8250-dispcc";
>>         reg = <0x0af00000 0x10000>;
>> @@ -103,7 +104,7 @@ examples:
>>         #clock-cells = <1>;
>>         #reset-cells = <1>;
>>         #power-domain-cells = <1>;
>> -      power-domains = <&rpmhpd SM8250_MMCX>;
>> +      power-domains = <&rpmhpd RPMHPD_MMCX>;
>>         required-opps = <&rpmhpd_opp_low_svs>;
>>       };
>>   ...
> Does this file still need to include old header? The same is applicable
> to some of the other files in the patch also.
>
> We also discussed on the other thread [1] to move the regulator level
> definitions to new header. should this change be done after that, so that
> we don't end up touching the very same files again?
>
> [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/a4zztrn6jhblozdswba7psqtvjt5l765mfr3yl4llsm5gsyqef@7x6q7yabydvm/
Removing this header directly would also be fine as we are not using any 
macro defined directly in these
bindings.
I already checked with dt_binding_check by removing this header.

Thanks,
Rohit.