[PATCH 3/3] drm/msm/dp: Clean up pdev/dev duplication in dp_power

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On 21/05/2023 06:53, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 04:26:59AM +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 15/05/2023 06:02, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> The dp_power module keeps track of both the DP controller's struct
>>> platform_device and struct device - with the prior pulled out of the
>>> dp_parser module.
>>>
>>> Clean up the duplication by dropping the platform_device reference and
>>> just track the passed struct device.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande at quicinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c | 16 +++++++---------
>>>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c
>>> index 031d2eefef07..9be645f91211 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_power.c
>>> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
>>>    struct dp_power_private {
>>>    	struct dp_parser *parser;
>>> -	struct platform_device *pdev;
>>>    	struct device *dev;
>>>    	struct drm_device *drm_dev;
>>>    	struct clk *link_clk_src;
>>> @@ -28,7 +27,7 @@ static int dp_power_clk_init(struct dp_power_private *power)
>>>    {
>>>    	int rc = 0;
>>>    	struct dss_module_power *core, *ctrl, *stream;
>>> -	struct device *dev = &power->pdev->dev;
>>> +	struct device *dev = power->dev;
>>>    	core = &power->parser->mp[DP_CORE_PM];
>>>    	ctrl = &power->parser->mp[DP_CTRL_PM];
>>> @@ -153,7 +152,7 @@ int dp_power_client_init(struct dp_power *dp_power)
>>>    	power = container_of(dp_power, struct dp_power_private, dp_power);
>>> -	pm_runtime_enable(&power->pdev->dev);
>>> +	pm_runtime_enable(power->dev);
>>>    	return dp_power_clk_init(power);
>>>    }
>>> @@ -164,7 +163,7 @@ void dp_power_client_deinit(struct dp_power *dp_power)
>>>    	power = container_of(dp_power, struct dp_power_private, dp_power);
>>> -	pm_runtime_disable(&power->pdev->dev);
>>> +	pm_runtime_disable(power->dev);
>>>    }
>>>    int dp_power_init(struct dp_power *dp_power, bool flip)
>>> @@ -174,11 +173,11 @@ int dp_power_init(struct dp_power *dp_power, bool flip)
>>>    	power = container_of(dp_power, struct dp_power_private, dp_power);
>>> -	pm_runtime_get_sync(&power->pdev->dev);
>>> +	pm_runtime_get_sync(power->dev);
>>>    	rc = dp_power_clk_enable(dp_power, DP_CORE_PM, true);
>>>    	if (rc)
>>> -		pm_runtime_put_sync(&power->pdev->dev);
>>> +		pm_runtime_put_sync(power->dev);
>>>    	return rc;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -190,7 +189,7 @@ int dp_power_deinit(struct dp_power *dp_power)
>>>    	power = container_of(dp_power, struct dp_power_private, dp_power);
>>>    	dp_power_clk_enable(dp_power, DP_CORE_PM, false);
>>> -	pm_runtime_put_sync(&power->pdev->dev);
>>> +	pm_runtime_put_sync(power->dev);
>>>    	return 0;
>>>    }
>>> @@ -199,12 +198,11 @@ struct dp_power *dp_power_get(struct device *dev, struct dp_parser *parser)
>>
>> Technically we don't even need to pass struct device here, we can get it
>> from parser->pdev->dev.
>>
> 
> Right, but afaict dp_init_sub_modules() passes struct device * as first
> parameter to all the "module" initializers. So it feels reasonable to
> keep it, for now, for symmetry.
> 
> What do you think?

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov at linaro.org>

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry