[PATCH] drm/stm: Fix resolution bitmasks
Marek Vasut
marex at denx.de
Fri May 26 09:05:12 UTC 2023
On 5/15/23 18:02, Philippe CORNU wrote:
Hi,
>>>> The genmask of regsiter SSCR, BPCR & others were setted accordly to
>>>> the chipset stm32f4.
>>>
>>> So that means:
>>> F4 -> 2048x2048 framebuffer
>>> H7/MP1 -> 4096x4096 framebuffer
>>> ?
>>
>> Worse
>>
>> F4 is 2048x2048
>> F7 is 4096x2048
>> MP1 is 4096x4096
>>
>> and there is no IDR register on F4/F7 like on MP1, or is there ?
>>
>> How else can we tell those LTDC versions apart ?
>>
>>
>
> Dear Marek,
> Many thanks for your patch (and sorry for this late reply).
> Your patch is good and fixes this ltdc driver source code vs. the
> related reference manual.
> imho, it will not be an issue for F4 & F7 series if these bit-fields are
> "bigger" as I am pretty sure stm32 MCUs are not really using such high
> resolutions.
> Yannick already replied with his reviewed-by. I add my
>
> Acked-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu at foss.st.com>
>
> If you agree, I will merge your patch really soon.
I would say there is no rush, so let's get this done right .
> Dear Yannick,
> You may add to your todo list to double check if there is a need to
> detect stm32 MCUs vs. these bit-field sizes...
Can we use a compatible string , or I think there is some ID register ?
[...]
btw I only received this email now, odd, I wonder whether it was stuck
in some SMTP server. Sorry for the delayed reply, it was out of my control.
More information about the dri-devel
mailing list