[PATCH V3 drm-dp 3/4] drm/hisilicon/hibmc: add dp hw moduel in hibmc

[Dmitry Baryshkov]

On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 06:06, Yongbang Shi <shiyongbang at huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 06:50:27PM +0800, Yongbang Shi wrote:
> >> From: baihan li <libaihan at huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Build a dp level that hibmc driver can enable dp by
> >> calling their functions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: baihan li <libaihan at huawei.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: yongbang shi <shiyongbang at huawei.com>
> >> ---
> >> ChangeLog:
> >> v2 -> v3:
> >>    - fix build errors reported by kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> >>      Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410250931.UDQ9s66H-lkp@intel.com/
> >> v1 -> v2:
> >>    - changed some defines and functions to former patch, suggested by Dmitry Baryshkov.
> >>    - sorting the headers including in dp_hw.h and hibmc_drm_drv.c files, suggested by Dmitry Baryshkov.
> >>    - deleting struct dp_mode and dp_mode_cfg function, suggested by Dmitry Baryshkov.
> >>    - fix build errors reported by kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
> >>      Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410040328.VeVxM9yB-lkp@intel.com/
> >>    v1:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240930100610.782363-1-shiyongbang@huawei.com/
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile    |   2 +-
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c  | 237 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.h  |  31 +++
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_reg.h |  41 ++++
> >>   4 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c
> >>   create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile
> >> index 94d77da88bbf..214228052ccf 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile
> >> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> >>   # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> >>   hibmc-drm-y := hibmc_drm_drv.o hibmc_drm_de.o hibmc_drm_vdac.o hibmc_drm_i2c.o \
> >> -           dp/dp_aux.o dp/dp_link.o
> >> +           dp/dp_aux.o dp/dp_link.o dp/dp_hw.o
> >>
> >>   obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_HISI_HIBMC) += hibmc-drm.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..214897798bdb
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> >> +// Copyright (c) 2024 Hisilicon Limited.
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/io.h>
> >> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> >> +#include "dp_config.h"
> >> +#include "dp_comm.h"
> >> +#include "dp_reg.h"
> >> +#include "dp_hw.h"
> >> +#include "dp_link.h"
> >> +#include "dp_aux.h"
> >> +
> >> +static int hibmc_dp_link_init(struct dp_dev *dp)
> >> +{
> >> +    dp->link.cap.lanes = 2;
> >> +    dp->link.train_set = devm_kzalloc(dp->dev->dev,
> >> +                                      dp->link.cap.lanes * sizeof(u8), GFP_KERNEL);
> > Can you replace it just with an array, removing a need for an additional
> > allocation?
> >
> >> +    if (!dp->link.train_set)
> >> +            return -ENOMEM;
> >> +
> >> +    dp->link.cap.link_rate = 1;
> > Ok, this is why I don't link using indices for link rates. Which rate is
> > this? Unlike cap.lanes this is pure magic number. I think it should be
> > handled other way around: store actual link rate and convert to the
> > register value when required.
> >
> >> +
> >> +    return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void hibmc_dp_set_tu(struct dp_dev *dp, struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> >> +{
> >> +    u32 tu_symbol_frac_size;
> >> +    u32 tu_symbol_size;
> >> +    u32 rate_ks;
> >> +    u8 lane_num;
> >> +    u32 value;
> >> +    u32 bpp;
> >> +
> >> +    lane_num = dp->link.cap.lanes;
> >> +    if (lane_num == 0) {
> >> +            drm_err(dp->dev, "set tu failed, lane num cannot be 0!\n");
> >> +            return;
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    bpp = DP_BPP;
> > Where is this defined? Is it hibmc-specific or a generic value?
> >
> >> +    rate_ks = hibmc_dp_get_link_rate(dp->link.cap.link_rate) * DP_LINK_RATE_CAL;
> > same question
>
> Hi Dmitry,
> Thanks for your detailed suggestions and questions. These two are defined in dp_config.h.

Please move defines to the corresponding patch, when the values are
being used. Also if these defines are HIBMC-specific, please use the
corresponding prefix (when one sees DP_foo they expect a constant
defined in the standard, not a driver-specific value).



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry