[PATCH V3 drm-dp 3/4] drm/hisilicon/hibmc: add dp hw moduel in hibmc

[Yongbang Shi]

> On Tue, 5 Nov 2024 at 06:06, Yongbang Shi <shiyongbang at huawei.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 01, 2024 at 06:50:27PM +0800, Yongbang Shi wrote:
>>>> From: baihan li <libaihan at huawei.com>
>>>>
>>>> Build a dp level that hibmc driver can enable dp by
>>>> calling their functions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: baihan li <libaihan at huawei.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: yongbang shi <shiyongbang at huawei.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> ChangeLog:
>>>> v2 -> v3:
>>>>     - fix build errors reported by kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
>>>>       Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410250931.UDQ9s66H-lkp@intel.com/
>>>> v1 -> v2:
>>>>     - changed some defines and functions to former patch, suggested by Dmitry Baryshkov.
>>>>     - sorting the headers including in dp_hw.h and hibmc_drm_drv.c files, suggested by Dmitry Baryshkov.
>>>>     - deleting struct dp_mode and dp_mode_cfg function, suggested by Dmitry Baryshkov.
>>>>     - fix build errors reported by kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
>>>>       Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202410040328.VeVxM9yB-lkp@intel.com/
>>>>     v1:https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240930100610.782363-1-shiyongbang@huawei.com/
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile    |   2 +-
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c  | 237 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.h  |  31 +++
>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_reg.h |  41 ++++
>>>>    4 files changed, 310 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>    create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c
>>>>    create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile
>>>> index 94d77da88bbf..214228052ccf 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/Makefile
>>>> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
>>>>    # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>>>    hibmc-drm-y := hibmc_drm_drv.o hibmc_drm_de.o hibmc_drm_vdac.o hibmc_drm_i2c.o \
>>>> -           dp/dp_aux.o dp/dp_link.o
>>>> +           dp/dp_aux.o dp/dp_link.o dp/dp_hw.o
>>>>
>>>>    obj-$(CONFIG_DRM_HISI_HIBMC) += hibmc-drm.o
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..214897798bdb
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hisilicon/hibmc/dp/dp_hw.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,237 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
>>>> +// Copyright (c) 2024 Hisilicon Limited.
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>>>> +#include "dp_config.h"
>>>> +#include "dp_comm.h"
>>>> +#include "dp_reg.h"
>>>> +#include "dp_hw.h"
>>>> +#include "dp_link.h"
>>>> +#include "dp_aux.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +static int hibmc_dp_link_init(struct dp_dev *dp)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    dp->link.cap.lanes = 2;
>>>> +    dp->link.train_set = devm_kzalloc(dp->dev->dev,
>>>> +                                      dp->link.cap.lanes * sizeof(u8), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> Can you replace it just with an array, removing a need for an additional
>>> allocation?
>>>
>>>> +    if (!dp->link.train_set)
>>>> +            return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> +    dp->link.cap.link_rate = 1;
>>> Ok, this is why I don't link using indices for link rates. Which rate is
>>> this? Unlike cap.lanes this is pure magic number. I think it should be
>>> handled other way around: store actual link rate and convert to the
>>> register value when required.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +    return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void hibmc_dp_set_tu(struct dp_dev *dp, struct drm_display_mode *mode)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    u32 tu_symbol_frac_size;
>>>> +    u32 tu_symbol_size;
>>>> +    u32 rate_ks;
>>>> +    u8 lane_num;
>>>> +    u32 value;
>>>> +    u32 bpp;
>>>> +
>>>> +    lane_num = dp->link.cap.lanes;
>>>> +    if (lane_num == 0) {
>>>> +            drm_err(dp->dev, "set tu failed, lane num cannot be 0!\n");
>>>> +            return;
>>>> +    }
>>>> +
>>>> +    bpp = DP_BPP;
>>> Where is this defined? Is it hibmc-specific or a generic value?
>>>
>>>> +    rate_ks = hibmc_dp_get_link_rate(dp->link.cap.link_rate) * DP_LINK_RATE_CAL;
>>> same question
>> Hi Dmitry,
>> Thanks for your detailed suggestions and questions. These two are defined in dp_config.h.
> Please move defines to the corresponding patch, when the values are
> being used. Also if these defines are HIBMC-specific, please use the
> corresponding prefix (when one sees DP_foo they expect a constant
> defined in the standard, not a driver-specific value).

Hi Dmitry,
I got it, I will fix it in next version.
Thanks,
Baihan.