[PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-main: Add tidss clk-ctrl property

Louis Chauvet louis.chauvet at bootlin.com
Thu Jul 31 09:50:16 UTC 2025



Le 31/07/2025 à 02:17, Rob Herring a écrit :
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 07:02:46PM +0200, Louis Chauvet wrote:
>> For am62 processors, we need to use the newly created clk-ctrl property to
>> properly handle data edge sampling configuration. Add them in the main
>> device tree.
>>
>> Fixes: 32a1795f57ee ("drm/tidss: New driver for TI Keystone platform Display SubSystem")
>> Signed-off-by: Louis Chauvet <louis.chauvet at bootlin.com>
>> ---
>>
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi | 6 ++++++
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi
>> index 9e0b6eee9ac77d66869915b2d7bec3e2275c03ea..d3131e6da8e70fde035d3c44716f939e8167795a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62-main.dtsi
>> @@ -76,6 +76,11 @@ audio_refclk1: clock-controller at 82e4 {
>>   			assigned-clock-parents = <&k3_clks 157 18>;
>>   			#clock-cells = <0>;
>>   		};
>> +
>> +		dss_clk_ctrl: dss_clk_ctrl at 8300 {
>> +			compatible = "ti,am625-dss-clk-ctrl", "syscon";
>> +			reg = <0x8300 0x4>;
> 
> H/w blocks are rarely only 4 bytes of registers... Does this belong to
> some larger block. The problem with bindings defining single registers
> like this is they don't get defined until needed and you have a constant
> stream of DT updates.

In this case, I don't think there is a "larger block". This register 
exists only because TI had issues in the display controller [1].

Here is the extract of MMR registers ([2], page 4311):

[...]
A2E4h AUDIO_REFCLK1_CTRL_PROXY <unrelated>
A300h DPI0_CLK_CTRL_PROXY <this register, 32 bits>
<nothing between 0xA304 and 0xA319>
A320h DSS_DISPC0_CLKSEL1_PROXY <an other dss clock stuff, 32 bits>
A330h MCASP0_CLKSEL_PROXY <unrelated>
[...]

I agree that DSS_DISPC_CLKSEL_PROXY is also related to DSS clock stuff, 
so may be included in the same block, but there is also a big hole in 
between. What do you think is better?

[1]:https://e2e.ti.com/support/processors-group/processors/f/processors-forum/1228207/am62a7-rgb-display-flickering-and-pixel-issue/4687209#4687209
[2]:https://www.ti.com/lit/ug/spruiv7b/spruiv7b.pdf#page=4311

>> +		};
>>   	};
>>   
>>   	dmss: bus at 48000000 {
>> @@ -787,6 +792,7 @@ dss: dss at 30200000 {
>>   			 <&k3_clks 186 2>;
>>   		clock-names = "fck", "vp1", "vp2";
>>   		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 84 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> +		ti,clk-ctrl = <&dss_clk_ctrl>;
>>   		status = "disabled";
>>   
>>   		dss_ports: ports {
>>
>> -- 
>> 2.50.1
>>

-- 
Louis Chauvet, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com



More information about the dri-devel mailing list