Preparing for a stable branch of flatpak

[James]

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Allan Day <allanpday at gmail.com> wrote:

[snip]

>  c) they leak implementation details which users won't know how to interpret
> (particularly the "ref" in "flatpakref")

I agree that the "ref" part is unclear.

> .flatpakrepo and .flatpakref aren't an issue if you're a developer and know
> what they mean. It's regular users who aren't familiar with these things
> that might have problems.

How about .fprepo and .fpref ? By abbreviating the flatpak as fp, we
get something shorter, but not too short.

Cheers,
James