Development model changes, reviewers wanted

[Philip Withnall]

On Tue, 2017-09-26 at 14:35 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> With the soon to be release of 0.10 I think we're in a pretty good
> place wrt features and usefulness. I mean, there are still a bunch of
> features on the 1.0 blocker list, but we also closed a lot of them.
> 
> Until now the development model has been pretty ad-hoc, with some
> work
> happening in github PRs, but others just by me pushing my local work.
> 
> I would like to change that to be a bit more controlled, with all
> changes going through github PRs, with working CI testing and all
> changes having some review.

I think this is an excellent idea. Are you eventually intending to get
some official comaintainers?

> However, that is going to require more people being involved in
> flatpak
>  development, because otherwise we will not have enough reviewing
> going
> on. Are there some people who have time to sign up for doing some
> level
> of flatpak PR review?

I can sign up to do PR review of things related to P2P. Not sure I
currently have time for anything more than that, sorry.

Philip
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/flatpak/attachments/20170926/21df0d55/attachment.sig>