[Fontconfig] Adding FC_POSTSCRIPT_NAME
behdad at behdad.org
Wed Feb 6 11:36:47 PST 2013
On 13-02-06 05:24 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> Yes, you're right. I'm trying to address that issue in next release as far as
> possible though, bumping the cache version quickly isn't also a good idea. the
> value in FC_POSTSCRIPT_NAME itself will not be changed once it's available. so
> it's not that bad thing to do that this time, without even the match part in
> the worst case anyway...
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at behdad.org
> <mailto:behdad at behdad.org>> wrote:
> On 02/05/2013 03:57 AM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> > Hi,
> > In next release, some new objects will be added to the cache and planning to
> > bump the cache version due to that. as I posted before, regarding to this, I
> > have one more plan to add new object, FC_POSTSCRIPT_NAME (too long?)
> into the
> > cache. it may be a good time to do so during this breakage. that said, I
> > haven't yet addressed all of issues around it. so I won't update the matcher
> > this time because not giving any effects to the score.
> > any comments?
> Ideally matching on POSTSCRIPT_NAME is what PDF viewers want ,so it would be
> rather useless without the match part.
> Akira TAGOH
More information about the Fontconfig