[Fontconfig] Prgname and font-features?

[Akira TAGOH]

I don't mind either though, it looks too long? and we have some objects
that possibly has multiple values already though, we don't call it
ENABLE_*. for instance, lang related things can be called like that but we
don't. so I suppose we don't need it for even that purpose.


On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at behdad.org> wrote:

> On 13-01-10 09:38 PM, Akira TAGOH wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at behdad.org
> > <mailto:behdad at behdad.org>> wrote:
> >
> >     I don't think we should validate.  Just pass data around.  Should we
> call it
> >     OT_FEATURES or more generically FONT_FEATURES?  If and when we add
> AAT support
> >     (or the existing Graphite support), those backends will use these
> same tags as
> >     far as HarfBuzz API is concerned.  CSS calls them font-features,
> that's why I
> >     chose that.
> >
> >
> > Aha. that sounds good then. let's call it FONT_FEATURES.
>
> Humm.  In case we may want to add code to list all features from the font
> in
> the future, perhaps we should call this ENABLE_FONT_FEATURES?
>
> --
> behdad
> http://behdad.org/
>



-- 
Akira TAGOH
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/fontconfig/attachments/20130115/ee63573d/attachment.html>