[Fontconfig] performance issue questions
keithp at keithp.com
Mon Nov 28 05:30:01 UTC 2016
Akira TAGOH <akira at tagoh.org> writes:
> The former one was what I took measures for that. I expect it works as long
> as the process is done within the most accurate time.
Is there some place we could add a suitable delay to ensure that file
system without sub-section timestamps could get reliable results using
inexpensive timestamp checking, rather than expensive file scanning? I
recall placing a 'sleep' in the cache generation code, but presumably
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Fontconfig