[fprint] elan patch + poc 0x903 and 0x0C03
Hans de Goede
hdegoede at redhat.com
Mon Jun 18 13:01:38 UTC 2018
On 18-06-18 14:58, Igor Filatov wrote:
> I'd like to but I'm worried that people will have bad experience with these devices (esp. 96x96 ones) and blame libfprint. And I still haven't had the chance to pull in latest upstream, so...
Well ATM people are just blindly adding new USB-ids without
even getting all the improvements which have been done, so
although I agree that these devices need more work
(specifically a better match algorithm more suited for
low res devices), I still think it would be good to at least
get what we have upstream.
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 3:53 PM Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net <mailto:hadess at hadess.net>> wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 15:11 +0100, Sébastien Béchet wrote:
> > On 2018-01-17 12:12, Igor Filatov wrote:
> > > Looks like o1ca as well https://github.com/iafilatov/libfprint/pull
> > > /4
> > Not o1ca but 0x0C1A. I create repository for POC:
> > http://github.com/sbechet/elanfp
> Any plans on sending those changes from both trees up for merging on
> the freedesktop GitLab?
> fprint mailing list
> fprint at lists.freedesktop.org
More information about the fprint