[fprint] elan patch + poc 0x903 and 0x0C03

Bastien Nocera hadess at hadess.net
Mon Jun 18 13:03:51 UTC 2018

On Mon, 2018-06-18 at 15:01 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> On 18-06-18 14:58, Igor Filatov wrote:
> > I'd like to but I'm worried that people will have bad experience
> > with these devices (esp. 96x96 ones) and blame libfprint. And I
> > still haven't had the chance to pull in latest upstream, so...
> Well ATM people are just blindly adding new USB-ids without

Who's blindly doing that?

> even getting all the improvements which have been done, so
> although I agree that these devices need more work
> (specifically a better match algorithm more suited for
> low res devices), I still think it would be good to at least
> get what we have upstream.

I agree that even if we choose to disable those smaller resolution
devices, we probably want the code to drive them to be upstreamed.

We can easily hide those behind a compilation flag too.

More information about the fprint mailing list