[Freedreno] [[RFC]DPU PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: drm/bridge: Document sn65dsi86 bridge bindings

[Rob Herring]

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:46:13PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Stephen Boyd <swboyd at chromium.org> wrote:
> > Quoting Sandeep Panda (2018-04-19 10:56:06)
> >> Document the bindings used for the sn65dsi86 DSI to eDP bridge.
> >>
> >> Changes in v1:
> >>  - Rephrase the dt-binding descriptions to be more inline with existing
> >>    bindings (Andrzej Hajda).
> >>  - Add missing dt-binding that are parsed by corresponding driver
> >>    (Andrzej Hajda).
> >>
> >> Changes in v2:
> >>  - Removed edp panel specific dt-binding entries. Only keep bridge
> >>    specific entries (Sean Paul).
> >>  - Remove custom-modes dt entry since its usage is removed from driver also (Sean Paul).
> >>  - Remove is-pluggable dt entry since this will not be needed anymore (Sean Paul).
> >>
> >> Changes in v3:
> >>  - Removed irq-gpio dt entry and instead populate is an interrupt
> >>    property (Rob Herring).
> >
> > These changelogs usually go below the triple dash, but maybe drm is
> > different and wants them?
> 
> yeah, drm generally wants them in the commit msg rather than below the
> triple-dash, although I guess for bindings docs it should follow the
> rules for that tree.. I usually just fix up these sort of things as I
> apply patches, but not sure what other maintainers prefer

Well, these DPU patches aren't targeted for upstream so who cares.

Many patch revision changelogs I see are crap with statements like 
"implement changes requested by ??". But in this case, the changelog is 
really good.

Rob