[gst-devel] [KC]lasses proposal #1

[Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller]

On Tue, 2001-12-18 at 12:26, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:

> > As I told thomasvs, the key here is to discuss the klasses on their own,
> > without worrying about any directory hierarchies.  What I'm hoping is that
> > something that makes sense will magically appear.  Regardless, we all seem
> > to agree that the element klass should be used more broadly (whatever that
> > means), so we should settle on a basic structure *first*.
> 
> I don't agree they should be settled upon first.  I am hoping for the
> magic though ;) In any case, if your basic point is the class structure
> should be settled upon first, then let's do this hard and fast.

If klasses are to be discussed on their own I think it would be a bad
idea to halt the reordering of our directory structure based on it.
The point with reordering the directory structure in my opinion is a
purly practical one, to enable us to make better and more robust
buildscripts and more easily test them. Also making the directory
structure more intuitive for people navigating it looking to code.

We have GStreamer on a roll know, lets not halt that in order mull of
something unless the result of that mulling need to/will have direct
impact on our directory structure.

Christian