[gst-devel] Re: [gst-cvs] theuraeus www: www/docs/

[Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller]

No, you guys miss the issue. The www module is the website and
everything on the website should be in that module except application
binaries. If we deciding on random bits and pieces to not keep in CVS
the whole 'website in cvs' concept will eventually become
unmaintainable.

Christian

On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 10:27, David I. Lehn wrote:
> * David I. Lehn <dlehn at vt.edu> [20021217 03:51]:
> > * Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <Uraeus at linuxrising.org> [20021217 03:36]:
> > > To answer this one. Personally I think we should put them in CVS as
> > > everything else is there, but that the versioning is uneeded. We should
> > > just have the newest versions available.
> > > 
> > > Christian
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2002-12-13 at 01:25, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> > > > Hi guys,
> > > > 
> > > > just a question - is it at all useful that we put this in cvs ? seems to 
> > > > me like we're better off just uploading them, period.
> > > > 
> > 
> > When we get around to parallel installable 0.6 and 0.7 then I think it
> > makes sense to have two versions online.  Like what is done for glib/gtk
> > now.  But at the moment probably only makes sense to have docs for 0.5
> > alive.
> > 
> 
> I guess I'm talking about versions there.  The question was about having
> the docs in CVS. ;)  I agree with tvs: it's not worth checking generated
> docs into CVS.
> 
> -dave
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:
> With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility 
> Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
> http://hpc.devchannel.org/
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
-- 
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller <Uraeus at linuxrising.org>