On Wed, 06 Feb 2002, David I. Lehn wrote: > * Erik Walthinsen <omega at temple-baptist.com> [20020202 23:19]: > > Looks like m4/ isn't dist'd either. > > should be i think i think we should just dist acinclude.m4, if anything, since we decided that cat m4/*.m4 > acinclude.m4 was the way to go. regards, wingo.