[gst-devel] plugin breakage

Benjamin Otte in7y118 at public.uni-hamburg.de
Sun Nov 2 08:57:16 CET 2003


On Sat, 1 Nov 2003, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:

> There's a big gap between "having the freedom to experiment and rewrite
> code" and "breaking the build intentionally".  Now that we all have
> decided that we will focus on HEAD development, we need to make sure it
> at least compiles :)
>
It was intentional, because this way it's done faster.
This evening plugins will compile again I think. Most of it compiles right
now. THis would never have worked on a branch because people don'T use
branches :/

> Thanks for the write-up on what to do, it's a good start.  But I'm a bit
> afraid that it will take us a) more than a week to get gst-plugisn to
> compile again and b) having multiple persons work on multiple plugins
> will degrade the quality or coherency of the result...
>
Multiple people working on the same plugin is what we call peer review and
actually helps IMO.
I've fixed quite some things already while doing that stuff.

Benjamin

>
> Thomas
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> _______________________________________________
> gstreamer-devel mailing list
> gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gstreamer-devel
>





More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list