[gst-devel] status of rtp packetizers
Thomas Vander Stichele
thomas at apestaart.org
Thu Nov 10 02:04:15 CET 2005
On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 14:25 -0300, Edgard Lima wrote:
> I have already change the following plugins so they are compliant with
> the 'todo' proposed.
> Since, apply that changes implies in removing the old ones I would like
> know if everybody agree with it and I can commit?
>
> gstrtpg711enc - gstg711payload
> gstrtpg711dec - gstg711depayload
>
> gstrtpgsmenc - gstgsmpayload
> gstrtpgsmdec - gstgsmdepayload
>
> gstrtpamrenc - gstamrpayload
> gstrtpamrdec - gstamrdepayload
>
> gstrtpmpaenc - gstmpapayload
> gstrtpmpadec - gstmpadepayload
>
> New element: gstspeexpayload and gstspeexdepayload
Hi,
I don't like this idea. rtp is not the only mechanism that wraps codecs
into a transport layer. And you're making the names longer without any
benefit. Personally I have suggested to replace "enc" with "pay" and
"dec" with "depay".
Thomas
Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
<-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
Come on baby take a walk with me honey
Tell me who do you love
Who do you love
More information about the gstreamer-devel
mailing list