[gst-devel] status of rtp packetizers

Edgard Lima edgard.lima at indt.org.br
Thu Nov 10 04:30:18 CET 2005

I agree with you Thomas.

Now I dont know if it is still worthwile to changes names from

gstrtpCODECenc to gstrtpCODECpay
gstrtpCODECdec to gstrtpCODECdepay

what do you think Kai?

Thomas, when can we commit? after Nov-19?

I ve two new elements to comit

gstrtpspeexpay and gstrtpspeexdepay
gstrtplpcmpay and gstrtplpcmdepay

should I wait until that?

Best Regards,
edgard.lima at indt.org.br

Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:

>On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 14:25 -0300, Edgard Lima wrote:
>>I have already change the following plugins so they are compliant with 
>>the 'todo' proposed.
>>Since, apply that changes implies in removing the old ones I would like 
>>know if everybody agree with it and I can commit?
>>gstrtpg711enc - gstg711payload
>>gstrtpg711dec - gstg711depayload
>>gstrtpgsmenc - gstgsmpayload
>>gstrtpgsmdec - gstgsmdepayload
>>gstrtpamrenc - gstamrpayload
>>gstrtpamrdec - gstamrdepayload
>>gstrtpmpaenc - gstmpapayload
>>gstrtpmpadec - gstmpadepayload
>>New element: gstspeexpayload and gstspeexdepayload
>I don't like this idea.  rtp is not the only mechanism that wraps codecs
>into a transport layer.  And you're making the names longer without any
>benefit.  Personally I have suggested to replace "enc" with "pay" and
>"dec" with "depay".
>Dave/Dina : future TV today ! - http://www.davedina.org/
><-*- thomas (dot) apestaart (dot) org -*->
>Come on baby take a walk with me honey
>Tell me who do you love
>Who do you love
>SF.Net email is sponsored by:
>Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
>it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
>Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
>gstreamer-devel mailing list
>gstreamer-devel at lists.sourceforge.net

More information about the gstreamer-devel mailing list