[gst-devel] ffmpeg muxers - index not written in the result file
Julien Isorce
julien.isorce at gmail.com
Tue Nov 25 12:22:04 CET 2008
Launching the test in first and second way, with GST_DEBUG:ffmpeg:5
I can see that with "./test 1 rec.asf" then "gst_ffmpegenc_flush_buffers" is
called woth param TRUE whereas in the second way the parameter is FALSE.
So I think the last buffer, which contains index informations maybe, is not
sent to the muxer and so not written into the result file.
Why a such distinction in "gst_ffmpegenc_flush_buffers" (param send 0/1) ?
Sincerely
Julien
2008/11/25 Julien Isorce <julien.isorce at gmail.com>
> Hi
>
> I join to this mail a simple test.
>
> The test demonstrates that when the pipeline is stopped when sending eos
> from the client code, then ffmux_asf does not write the index, so it's not
> possible to seek when playing back the result file.
> If I set num_buffers=N instead of sending eos, then the muxer write the
> index.
>
> Yes it should be the same result because when GstBaseSrc reachs
> num_buffers_left = 0 then it return GST_FLOW_UNEXPECTED then an EOS is
> generated.
>
> So something is not flushed when ffmux receive eos in the first way.
>
> Is it a bug from gstffmpegmux or a problem in ffmpeg-asfmux-libavcodec ? or
> something else ?
>
> ( ./test 0 rec.asf -> index not written) (eos sent from a g_timeout_add
> callback)
> ( ./test 1 rec.asf -> asf correclty generated) (use num_buffers=N)
>
> Sincerely
>
> Julien
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/gstreamer-devel/attachments/20081125/81a88940/attachment.htm>
More information about the gstreamer-devel
mailing list