best way to determine devices with drivers
davej at redhat.com
Thu Jun 24 06:14:58 PDT 2004
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:02:42PM +0100, Jono Bacon wrote:
> >One area where this does get complicated is that the various
> >enterprise distros sometimes ship multiple versions of the same
> >module, with slightly different names. Such deviations could
> >(and should) be maintained in the HAL packages for those distros IMO.
> >Just making things work with a mainline kernel should cover 99%
> >of cases. The other 1% can probably figure it out themselves.
> I think this is the key - most kernels should be good. When Project
> Utopia is working with a vanilla kernel, maybe it will encourage
> distributors to get involved so they can adopt the technology.
> Out of curiosity, does anyone know what the LSB have to say about the
> use of binary modules? Do they dictate that it should be vanilla?
I doubt theres any mention of them there. In part due to the
fact that there have been ( and probably won't ever be ) any
ABI guarantees between kernel & modules.
Even some of the enterprise vendor kernels that claim to
provide ABI guarantees end up breaking it at times.
Sometimes it's just unavoidable.
hal mailing list
hal at freedesktop.org
More information about the Hal