[PATCH] include mount.h instead of include linux/fs.h

[Kay Sievers]

On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 09:36:19PM -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 21:23 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> > Luis (mumbling about distros only two months old)

Ok, I just reverted the patch for now, until we figure out why some
distros that far behind. If there is not a really good reason for them,
I think we should not care too much in the future and force them to catch
up. :)

> Matthew Garrett mentioned on IRC that we may want to keep local copies
> of non-standard non-glibc kernel headers and use those if the e.g. ioctl
> wasn't found. Also a remark that Linux kernel developers encourage this.

Hmm, the thing is that on the usual architectures these headers are not a
real problem, but the more exotic ones are causing all sort of problems.
I don't think, that we should import these kind of problems into the HAL
source. :)

Thanks,
Kay

_______________________________________________
hal mailing list
hal at lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/hal