Video PM methods
Danny Kukawka
danny.kukawka at web.de
Fri Apr 28 04:16:08 PDT 2006
On Friday 28 April 2006 11:02, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:53:08AM +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > I would do this for all kind of intel 855GM or any other of the intel
> > cards. This is not needed for all of them. This base on the machine (and
> > also the bios version) and not on the graphic chip. I have seen several
> > machines where this is not needed. In fact you need this only on some
> > special machines. If this go in HAL we need to list this special effected
> > machines (as you e.g. can find in s2ram) and not the graphic card.
> I'm not entirely clear on what you mean by "this" here, but most
> Intel-based machines need some degree of poking in order to make the
> screen come back.
This mean: allow use vbetool/add this methode on each intel chip.
> The "right" way to do this is probably to have the
> default be POSTing and then restoring the VBE state, and then allow that
> to be overridden by FDI files.
No. We should only add the devices/machines wich need a workaround instead of
add this methodes by default and disallow/remove/blacklist machines where
this is not needed or break something.
Danny
More information about the hal
mailing list