memory freeing necessary?

Matthew Johnson dbus at matthew.ath.cx
Tue Jul 25 07:05:13 PDT 2006


I'm copying this to the DBus list because there is currently a
discussion on where we should install introspection files to.

Matt

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, David Zeuthen wrote:

> On Sat, 2006-07-22 at 18:11 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> I've got quite a nice libhal-glib implementation if you think this is
>> useful to have in hal. It's a standard singleton gobject, so desktop
>> applications can just receive standard signals on a gobject and not have
>> to worry about dbus at all (as some of the stuff like using
>> PropertyModified is pretty gruesome...)
>> It's pretty lightweight, and converts the odd types such as char ***
>> into 'friendly' GLists and other nice stuff.
>>
>> What you think? Want a patch?
>
> How does this compare to generating code using our introspection XML and
> dbus-binding-tool?
>
> Oh, and, another point is that we should probably install the
> introspection XML somewhere so distros can ship it as part of the
> hal-devel (or what they choose to name it) package and it can be used
> for BuildRequires. I'm way behind on the dbus list, last time I checked
> there was no specified location and naming structure, e.g. the dbus spec
> could say:
>
> It's OPTIONAL for services to install introspection data, but if they
> do it needs to be stored in
>
>  /usr/share/dbus/introspection-data/<service-name>/<interface-name>.xml
>
> so we would e.g. install
>
> /usr/share/dbus/introspection-data/org.freedesktop.Hal/org.freedesktop.Hal.Manager.xml
> /usr/share/dbus/introspection-data/org.freedesktop.Hal/org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.xml
> /usr/share/dbus/introspection-data/org.freedesktop.Hal/org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Volume.xml
> /usr/share/dbus/introspection-data/org.freedesktop.Hal/org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Volume.Crypto.xml
>
> and so forth.
>
> We probably have to generate and maintain the XML by hand cuz some of it
> comes from weird add-ons :-) - but that's more of our problem because
> we've chosen to an extensible architecture. In reality it's not a big
> deal because we want these interfaces to be stable and not change.
>
>    David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hal mailing list
> hal at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/hal
>

-- 
Matthew Johnson
http://www.matthew.ath.cx/


More information about the hal mailing list