libhal-policy -> PolicyKit
david at fubar.dk
Thu Mar 9 14:04:27 PST 2006
On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 13:50 -0800, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> > 3. The Disconnected signal from the message bus for pid X
> > is guaranteed to arrive before a new call to the PolicyKit service
> > checking for the stuff in temporary_policy_override is done by
> > another pid X.
> As long as the daemon's request queue is an in-memory object, I think
> we're safe even without the two last items.
I assume you mean temporary_policy_override instead of 'request queue'.
> In any case I wouldn't rely
> on 3.
It would seem sane however that D-BUS should guarantee us this. No?
More information about the hal