libhal-policy -> PolicyKit

David Zeuthen david at
Thu Mar 9 14:04:27 PST 2006

On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 13:50 -0800, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> >  3. The Disconnected signal from the message bus for pid X
> >     is guaranteed to arrive before a new call to the PolicyKit service
> >     checking for the stuff in temporary_policy_override is done by
> >     another pid X.
> As long as the daemon's request queue is an in-memory object, I think 
> we're safe even without the two last items. 

I assume you mean temporary_policy_override instead of 'request queue'.

> In any case I wouldn't rely 
> on 3.

It would seem sane however that D-BUS should guarantee us this. No?


More information about the hal mailing list