[patch] Create a new device_pm.{c|h} for internal use
Danny Kukawka
danny.kukawka at web.de
Tue Jul 3 15:23:24 PDT 2007
On Dienstag, 3. Juli 2007, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 20:13 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > I have may overseen something, but where are the mails (with the
> > patches) to all these ACPI/PMU/APM commits in the last hour? They are
> > really confusing and I miss the discussion about them (at least the
> > commit logs are also not that descriptive in some cases).
>
> I was talking to davidz pretty much the whole time. I've tried to be as
> descriptive as possible and do tiny commits.
Sorry, please don't missunderstand this, but I hate this way of discussion in
the back of the mailing list if there are such massive changes. There should
be a way to discuss this via the ML so that other ppl/developer can comment
on such changes. I don't speak about small fixes, but about this kind of
movements/architecture changes.
> > I hope they introduce no new ACPI related bugs, the code is really
> > sensitive as you know.
>
> Sure, I've been very careful, but due to the small commits we can
> trivially git-bisect.
That's not funny if a user reports a problem.
> Most of the code is just cut and pasted, so the logic should be the same.
And what was not cut and pasted?
Danny
More information about the hal
mailing list