[patch] Create a new device_pm.{c|h} for internal use
Richard Hughes
hughsient at gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 15:31:46 PDT 2007
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 00:23 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> Sorry, please don't missunderstand this, but I hate this way of discussion in
> the back of the mailing list if there are such massive changes.
Code refactoring?
> There should
> be a way to discuss this via the ML so that other ppl/developer can comment
> on such changes. I don't speak about small fixes, but about this kind of
> movements/architecture changes.
Danny, with respect, I've spent much time in the past trying to get
battery refactoring done, all of which bitrotted. David is too busy to
get a few hours turn around time, and some of us have things to achieve
in a limited timeframe.
> > > I hope they introduce no new ACPI related bugs, the code is really
> > > sensitive as you know.
> >
> > Sure, I've been very careful, but due to the small commits we can
> > trivially git-bisect.
>
> That's not funny if a user reports a problem.
Then we can fix it.
Richard.
More information about the hal
mailing list