Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

[Frederic Crozat]

Le mercredi 02 mai 2007 à 12:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:59 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2007, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 12:10 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > Heya,
> > > >
> > > > I got ahold of the latest hal, pm-utils, and kernel from Rawhide, and
> > > > after some testing, realised that the Latitude D420's suspend worked
> > > > out-of-the-box. Ie. "echo mem > /sys/power/state" suspended the
> > > > computer, and pressing the power button resumed it with video and all.
> > > >
> > > > Should the D420 be whitelisted in hal-info to help out with possible
> > > > debugging?
> > >
> > > Sounds like a good idea. Sufficient to just leave a comment in the file?
> > > Or did you want something more fancy like merging a property saying
> > > essentially saying no quirks are needed?
> > 
> > I'm not sure if there are no quirks needed. s2ram handle the D420 with 
> > VBE_POST|VBE_MODE. 
> > 
> > I would speculate the resume for video work only with X, but not correct on 
> > console. So it make sence to not whitelist the device if one of both would 
> > not work correct. Please recheck if the suspend/resume would also work from 
> > init=/bin/bash correctly without vbe quirks. 
> 
> It looks like you're right, doesn't work on the console.

It is not a good idea to change D410 quirks while "fixing" D420
quirks ;)

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat at mandriva.com>
Mandriva