Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

[Bastien Nocera]

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:59 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2007, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 12:10 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > Heya,
> > >
> > > I got ahold of the latest hal, pm-utils, and kernel from Rawhide, and
> > > after some testing, realised that the Latitude D420's suspend worked
> > > out-of-the-box. Ie. "echo mem > /sys/power/state" suspended the
> > > computer, and pressing the power button resumed it with video and all.
> > >
> > > Should the D420 be whitelisted in hal-info to help out with possible
> > > debugging?
> >
> > Sounds like a good idea. Sufficient to just leave a comment in the file?
> > Or did you want something more fancy like merging a property saying
> > essentially saying no quirks are needed?
> 
> I'm not sure if there are no quirks needed. s2ram handle the D420 with 
> VBE_POST|VBE_MODE. 
> 
> I would speculate the resume for video work only with X, but not correct on 
> console. So it make sence to not whitelist the device if one of both would 
> not work correct. Please recheck if the suspend/resume would also work from 
> init=/bin/bash correctly without vbe quirks. 

It looks like you're right, doesn't work on the console.

-- 
Bastien Nocera <hadess at hadess.net> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: hal-info-D420-quirks.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 805 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/attachments/20070502/48394d44/hal-info-D420-quirks-0001.bin