Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

[David Zeuthen]

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 23:24 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:59 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > > Sounds like a good idea. Sufficient to just leave a comment in the file?
> > > Or did you want something more fancy like merging a property saying
> > > essentially saying no quirks are needed?
> > 
> > I'm not sure if there are no quirks needed. s2ram handle the D420 with 
> > VBE_POST|VBE_MODE. 
> 
> But Fedora and other distros don't necessarily use s2ram; the idea with
> having pm-utils and a common set of quirks really isn't that useful if
> s2ram/SUSE have a separate list of quirks... your, uh, thoughts on that?

Or maybe you already switched? Sorry if I made it sound like you were
using s2ram under the covers and you actually weren't.

     David