Whitelisting no-pm-quirks

[Danny Kukawka]

On Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007, David Zeuthen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 23:24 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 12:59 +0200, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> > > > Sounds like a good idea. Sufficient to just leave a comment in the
> > > > file? Or did you want something more fancy like merging a property
> > > > saying essentially saying no quirks are needed?
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if there are no quirks needed. s2ram handle the D420 with
> > > VBE_POST|VBE_MODE.
> >
> > But Fedora and other distros don't necessarily use s2ram; the idea with
> > having pm-utils and a common set of quirks really isn't that useful if
> > s2ram/SUSE have a separate list of quirks... your, uh, thoughts on that?
>
> Or maybe you already switched? Sorry if I made it sound like you were
> using s2ram under the covers and you actually weren't.

The point is not using s2ram or that s2ram would break. The point is that 
removing the quirk would break resume if you suspend via init=/bin/bash (the 
testcase) or console. This change only work under X. All this has nothing to 
do with s2ram, only with the suspend itself.

Danny