[Pm-utils] pm-utils-1.3.0 has been released
Martin Pitt
martin.pitt at ubuntu.com
Wed Mar 17 09:54:41 PDT 2010
Michael Biebl [2010-03-17 17:23 +0100]:
> I'm all for that, because I think the import process also has the
> potential risk of breaking something.
> Importing it once into pm-utils, then carefully checking if the
> imported database looks sane, and adding/modifying enties looks like
> a much more robust solution to me.
+1, FWIW.
> I would actually prefer, if we just shipped the quirks within the
> pm-utils tarball.
> Looking at the git branch, it looks like Victor wants to keep them in
> a separate tarball, even if they are in the same git repo.
Victor, did that happen more or less by accident, or was it a
conscious decision? I could envision a separate git tree for being
able to give more people commit privileges to the quirks git, while
keeping the privileges for pm-utils itself relatively tight?
Martin
--
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
More information about the hal
mailing list