[HarfBuzz] I wonder why glyph 'uni0647' is not substituted with the one at 0xFEE9('uni06BE.fina') in Tahoma font

[Graham Douglas]

On 18/09/2013 10:32, Su Scott wrote:
> Thank you so much for the detail testing.
> It proves my resultis wrong.
> Hope I dig the reason out soon.
>
> ^ ^
>
> Scott 
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <<snip lots>>

Hi Scott

Just a suggestion, but try experimenting with the glyph uni0654 between
other pairs of joining characters to see if that also prevents correct
shaping behavior.

Best
Graham





-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/harfbuzz/attachments/20130918/71d83d11/attachment.html>