[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/perf: simplify enable-disable subtest
Matthew Auld
matthew.william.auld at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 09:47:56 UTC 2018
On 28 February 2018 at 15:25, Lionel Landwerlin
<lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com> wrote:
> We're printing a bunch of values that were meant to try to figure out
> the issue of the OA unit not producing reports. After fixing the i915
> driver with :
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39112/
>
> We don't need those values anymore. It turns out the issue was simply
> a race condition in the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/perf.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf.c b/tests/perf.c
> index ccbf030a..bac3c4a7 100644
> --- a/tests/perf.c
> +++ b/tests/perf.c
> @@ -2562,7 +2562,6 @@ test_enable_disable(void)
> struct drm_i915_perf_record_header *header;
> uint32_t first_timestamp = 0, last_timestamp = 0;
> uint32_t last_periodic_report[64];
> - double tick_per_period;
>
> /* Giving enough time for an overflow might help catch whether
> * the OA unit has been enabled even if the driver might at
> @@ -2599,7 +2598,6 @@ test_enable_disable(void)
>
> for (int offset = 0; offset < len; offset += header->size) {
> uint32_t *report;
> - double previous_tick_per_period;
>
> header = (void *) (buf + offset);
> report = (void *) (header + 1);
> @@ -2612,38 +2610,28 @@ test_enable_disable(void)
> first_timestamp = report[1];
> last_timestamp = report[1];
>
> - previous_tick_per_period = tick_per_period;
> -
> - if (n_periodic_reports > 0 &&
> - oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report)) {
> - tick_per_period =
> - oa_reports_tick_per_period(last_periodic_report,
> - report);
> -
> - if (!double_value_within(tick_per_period,
> - previous_tick_per_period, 5))
> - igt_debug("clock change!\n");
> -
> - igt_debug(" > report ts=%u"
> - " ts_delta_last_periodic=%8u is_timer=%i ctx_id=%8x gpu_ticks=%u nb_periodic=%u\n",
> - report[1],
> - report[1] - last_periodic_report[1],
> - oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report),
> - oa_report_get_ctx_id(report),
> - report[3] - last_periodic_report[3],
> - n_periodic_reports);
> + igt_debug(" > report ts=%8x"
> + " ts_delta_last_periodic=%s%8u"
> + " is_timer=%i ctx_id=0x%8x\n",
> + report[1],
> + oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report) ? " " : "*",
> + n_periodic_reports > 0 ? (report[1] - last_periodic_report[1]) : 0,
> + oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report),
> + oa_report_get_ctx_id(report));
>
> + if (oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report)) {
> memcpy(last_periodic_report, report,
> sizeof(last_periodic_report));
> - }
>
> - /* We want to measure only the periodic
> - * reports, ctx-switch might inflate the
> - * content of the buffer and skew or
> - * measurement.
> - */
> - n_periodic_reports +=
> - oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report);
> + /* We want to measure only the
> + * periodic reports, ctx-switch
> + * might inflate the content of
> + * the buffer and skew or
> + * measurement.
> + */
> + n_periodic_reports +=
> + oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report);
n_periodic_reports++;
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list