[igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/perf: simplify buffer-fill subtest
Matthew Auld
matthew.william.auld at gmail.com
Thu Mar 1 09:48:36 UTC 2018
On 28 February 2018 at 15:26, Lionel Landwerlin
<lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com> wrote:
> Much like the enable-disable subtest, we're printing a bunch of values
> that were meant to try to figure out the issue of the OA unit not
> producing reports. After fixing the i915 driver with :
>
> https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/39112/
>
> We don't need those values anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> ---
> tests/perf.c | 49 ++++---------------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf.c b/tests/perf.c
> index bac3c4a7..2ceaafdb 100644
> --- a/tests/perf.c
> +++ b/tests/perf.c
> @@ -210,16 +210,6 @@ get_oa_format(enum drm_i915_oa_format format)
> return gen8_oa_formats[format];
> }
>
> -static bool
> -double_value_within(double value,
> - double expected,
> - double percent_margin)
> -{
> - return value >= (expected - expected * percent_margin / 100.0) &&
> - value <= (expected + expected * percent_margin / 100.0);
> -
> -}
> -
> static void
> __perf_close(int fd)
> {
> @@ -479,17 +469,6 @@ oa_report_get_ctx_id(uint32_t *report)
> return report[2];
> }
>
> -static double
> -oa_reports_tick_per_period(uint32_t *report0, uint32_t *report1)
> -{
> - if (intel_gen(devid) < 8)
> - return 0.0;
> -
> - /* Measure the number GPU tick delta to timestamp delta. */
> - return (double) (report1[3] - report0[3]) /
> - (double) (report1[1] - report0[1]);
> -}
> -
> static void
> scratch_buf_memset(drm_intel_bo *bo, int width, int height, uint32_t color)
> {
> @@ -2394,7 +2373,6 @@ test_buffer_fill(void)
> uint32_t n_periodic_reports;
> uint32_t first_timestamp = 0, last_timestamp = 0;
> uint32_t last_periodic_report[64];
> - double tick_per_period;
>
> do_ioctl(stream_fd, I915_PERF_IOCTL_ENABLE, 0);
>
> @@ -2448,7 +2426,6 @@ test_buffer_fill(void)
>
> for (int offset = 0; offset < len; offset += header->size) {
> uint32_t *report;
> - double previous_tick_per_period;
>
> header = (void *) (buf + offset);
> report = (void *) (header + 1);
> @@ -2459,41 +2436,23 @@ test_buffer_fill(void)
> break;
> case DRM_I915_PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE:
> igt_debug(" > report ts=%u"
> - " ts_delta_last_periodic=%8u is_timer=%i ctx_id=%8x gpu_ticks=%u nb_periodic=%u\n",
> + " ts_delta_last_periodic=%8u is_timer=%i ctx_id=%8x nb_periodic=%u\n",
> report[1],
> n_periodic_reports > 0 ? report[1] - last_periodic_report[1] : 0,
> oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report),
> oa_report_get_ctx_id(report),
> - n_periodic_reports > 0 ? report[3] - last_periodic_report[3] : 0,
> n_periodic_reports);
>
> if (first_timestamp == 0)
> first_timestamp = report[1];
> last_timestamp = report[1];
>
> - previous_tick_per_period = tick_per_period;
> -
> - if (n_periodic_reports > 1 &&
> - oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report)) {
> - tick_per_period =
> - oa_reports_tick_per_period(last_periodic_report,
> - report);
> -
> - if (!double_value_within(previous_tick_per_period,
> - tick_per_period, 5))
> - igt_debug("clock change!\n");
> -
> + if (oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report)) {
> memcpy(last_periodic_report, report,
> sizeof(last_periodic_report));
> + n_periodic_reports +=
> + oa_report_is_periodic(oa_exponent, report);
n_periodic_reports++;
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list