[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Use smallest mode by default

Arkadiusz Hiler arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com
Tue Mar 13 08:20:37 UTC 2018


On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 08:34:50PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
> 
> Series: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Use smallest mode by default
> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/38337/
> State : failure
> 
> == Summary ==
> 
> IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build
> 89b915f5aa465d5c3498b170b1572fae20460491 tests/pm_rpm: Don't try to create an X-tiled ARGB8888 framebuffer
> 
> with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_3913
> 984ac365f1fa drm-tip: 2018y-03m-12d-19h-27m-16s UTC integration manifest
> 
> No testlist changes.
> 
> ---- Possible new issues:
> 
> Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
>         Subgroup basic:
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bdw-5557u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bdw-gvtdvm)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bsw-n3050)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bxt-j4205)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-byt-n2820)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-cfl-8700k)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-hsw-4770)
>                 skip       -> FAIL       (fi-ilk-650)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-ivb-3770)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-kbl-7500u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-kbl-7567u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-kbl-r)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6260u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6600u)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6700hq)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6700k2)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6770hq)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-guc)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-gvtdvm)
>                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-snb-2600)

I was about to r-b and push it so I gave it one final rerun after all
that happend to this test recently. Well, this is unexpected...

-Arek


More information about the igt-dev mailing list