[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Use smallest mode by default

[Chris Wilson]

Quoting Arkadiusz Hiler (2018-03-13 08:20:37)
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 08:34:50PM +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: igt/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: Use smallest mode by default
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/38337/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > IGT patchset tested on top of latest successful build
> > 89b915f5aa465d5c3498b170b1572fae20460491 tests/pm_rpm: Don't try to create an X-tiled ARGB8888 framebuffer
> > 
> > with latest DRM-Tip kernel build CI_DRM_3913
> > 984ac365f1fa drm-tip: 2018y-03m-12d-19h-27m-16s UTC integration manifest
> > 
> > No testlist changes.
> > 
> > ---- Possible new issues:
> > 
> > Test kms_frontbuffer_tracking:
> >         Subgroup basic:
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bdw-5557u)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bdw-gvtdvm)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bsw-n3050)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-bxt-j4205)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-byt-n2820)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-cfl-8700k)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-hsw-4770)
> >                 skip       -> FAIL       (fi-ilk-650)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-ivb-3770)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-kbl-7500u)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-kbl-7567u)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-kbl-r)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6260u)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6600u)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6700hq)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6700k2)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-6770hq)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-guc)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-skl-gvtdvm)
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-snb-2600)
> 
> I was about to r-b and push it so I gave it one final rerun after all
> that happend to this test recently. Well, this is unexpected...

Since Maarten just changed how it decides modesets, probably not too
unsurprising, but we had better warn that "--smallest" now appears to be
broken.
-Chris