[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests/kms_concurrent: Allow the test to proceed with fewer planes
Daniel Vetter
daniel at ffwll.ch
Wed Apr 3 08:36:41 UTC 2019
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:28:12AM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 21:21 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> >
> > Series: tests/kms_concurrent: Allow the test to proceed with fewer
> > planes
> > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/58872/
> > State : failure
> >
> > == Summary ==
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_4920_full -> IGTPW_2760_full
> > ====================================================
> >
> > Summary
> > -------
> >
> > **FAILURE**
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_2760_full absolutely need
> > to be
> > verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> > changes
> > introduced in IGTPW_2760_full, please notify your bug team to allow
> > them
> > to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> > positives in CI.
> >
> > External URL:
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/58872/revisions/1/mbox/
> >
> > Possible new issues
> > -------------------
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > IGTPW_2760_full:
> >
> > ### IGT changes ###
> >
> > #### Possible regressions ####
> >
> > * igt at kms_vblank@pipe-b-ts-continuation-modeset:
> > - shard-kbl: PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
>
> Not related at all.
>
> Patch pushed.
See my reply, I think we now have a test gap. Can you pls fill that again?
I know there's a pile of pressure, but that's no good reason to rush
stuff.
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
More information about the igt-dev
mailing list