[igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for tests/kms_concurrent: Allow the test to proceed with fewer planes

[Daniel Vetter]

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 12:28:12AM +0000, Souza, Jose wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-04-02 at 21:21 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
> > > == Series Details ==
> > > 
> > > Series: tests/kms_concurrent: Allow the test to proceed with fewer
> > > planes
> > > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/58872/
> > > State : failure
> > > 
> > > == Summary ==
> > > 
> > > CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_4920_full -> IGTPW_2760_full
> > > ====================================================
> > > 
> > > Summary
> > > -------
> > > 
> > >   **FAILURE**
> > > 
> > >   Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_2760_full absolutely need
> > > to be
> > >   verified manually.
> > >   
> > >   If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
> > > changes
> > >   introduced in IGTPW_2760_full, please notify your bug team to allow
> > > them
> > >   to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
> > > positives in CI.
> > > 
> > >   External URL: 
> > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/58872/revisions/1/mbox/
> > > 
> > > Possible new issues
> > > -------------------
> > > 
> > >   Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > > IGTPW_2760_full:
> > > 
> > > ### IGT changes ###
> > > 
> > > #### Possible regressions ####
> > > 
> > >   * igt at kms_vblank@pipe-b-ts-continuation-modeset:
> > >     - shard-kbl:          PASS -> DMESG-FAIL
> > 
> > Not related at all.
> > 
> > Patch pushed.
> 
> See my reply, I think we now have a test gap. Can you pls fill that again?
> 
> I know there's a pile of pressure, but that's no good reason to rush
> stuff.

btw I'll be on vacations for 1 week starting this Fri, so if you want me
to review your patch, pls send it out today.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch